The first time I saw this cover, I was annoyed by the fact that the type doesn’t stay in line with the perspective of the interior.
Now that I look at it again, however, I wonder if I shouldn’t be looking at the type more as a spaceship floating in the air, out of alignment with the floor.
I’m still undecided.
Regardless, a clever and appropriate solution for a subject matter that would commonly be given a more gaudy treatment.
The first time I saw this cover, I was annoyed by the fact that the type doesn’t stay in line with the perspective of the interior.
Now that I look at it again, however, I wonder if I shouldn’t be looking at the type more as a spaceship floating in the air, out of alignment with the floor.
I’m still undecided.
Regardless, a clever and appropriate solution for a subject matter that would commonly be given a more gaudy treatment.
— Ben Pieratt, 2006-07-05 09:40:00
Yuck! Hard to read and doesn’t fit with the theme of the book, unless its about bad special effects.
— SN, 2006-07-05 15:57:00
:)
Special effects. I get it.
— wiwimu, 2006-07-06 00:25:00
I dont like it. Whats the concept behind it?
— GraphicTechsan, 2006-07-07 08:08:00
I like it, very fun. Reminds me a bit of the main titles from “Panic Room”...
— GH, 2006-07-09 20:10:00
It reminds me a lot of this, too: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594200688/sr=8-2/qid=1152653129/ref=pd_bbs_2/103-4947127-6951867?ie=UTF8
— Sara Goldsmith, 2006-07-11 14:27:00
This works alright. I am having a hard time differentiating the title from the authors name.
— Broox Pulford, 2006-08-20 23:53:00
you’re all idiots
— GKSEOIFB, 2006-10-01 14:43:00
a great cover for a great book, what’s the problem here ?
— joost, 2007-05-11 04:29:00